Genesis 1:20-23

It only stands to reason that birds came from the waters, and I don't understand why evolutionists try to say lizards evolved into birds.  I don't agree with evolution due to scientific evidence that makes evolution a scientific impossibility, but that is for another article, however if I did agree with evolution I would have to stand against the lizard idea since lizards are a heavy laden animal, and to evolve wings would make them vulnerable and probably would have become extinct due to being caught in the gap of having limbs yet useless for flight and equally useless for climbing and hunting.  It would only stand to reason, fish are actually flying in a fluid environment, and I'm sure if you asked one of the rocks or life forms who are stuck to the bottom of the oceans/lakes, their response would be that the fish are actually flying.  Penguins are definately an aviary creature, with wings and an aerodynamic body, there are fish that have wings and can leap from the peaks of ocean swells and gluide a great distance.  It would not be a big stretch to imagine that one or more of them learned to flap those wings in the air and take flight.

Also on this the fifth day, God has done yet another different thing.  Until now, folaige was created which would propogate from seed.  The tree's and herbs have no blood, therefore in Biblical perspective no life, as the life is in the blood. To further distinguish the plants from animal creation, animals do not reproduce from seeds as plants do, they regenerate.  Egg's of most mamals, although we do call some of the repoductive ceels seeds, they are not truly seeds.  They have a life of their own, will live only for a short time, and must be cared for in most cases by the parent, with a few exceptions. It is also with the creation of the birds and insects that propogation for plants is now feasable since something needs to be present to insure pollination of the seed. If all the plants and tree's pollinated by airborn pollen then it is unlikely that evolutionary changes would have made them loose this ability in favor of being dependant upon birds and insects.  Even if the insects enhanced the pollination process there would have been no reason for the plants to enlarge the size of the pollen thus requiring animal carriers.

<< Previous    1  [2]  3    Next >>